Thank You For Reaching Out To Us
We have received your message and will get back to you within 24-48 hours. Have a great day!

Welcome to Haposoft Blog

Explore our blog for fresh insights, expert commentary, and real-world examples of project development that we're eager to share with you.
react-serve-components-vulnerabilities
latest post
Dec 12, 2025
15 min read
React Server Components Vulnerabilities And Required Security Fixes
The React team has disclosed additional security vulnerabilities affecting React Server Components, discovered while researchers were testing the effectiveness of last week’s critical patch (React2Shell). While these newly identified issues do not enable Remote Code Execution, they introduce serious risks, including Denial of Service (DoS) attacks and potential source code exposure. Due to their severity, immediate upgrades are strongly recommended. Overview of the Newly Disclosed Vulnerabilities Security researchers identified two new vulnerability classes in the same React Server Components packages affected by CVE-2025-55182. High Severity: Denial of Service (DoS) CVE-2025-55184 CVE-2025-67779 CVSS Score: 7.5 (High) A maliciously crafted HTTP request sent to a Server Function endpoint can trigger an infinite loop during deserialization, causing the server process to hang and consume CPU indefinitely. Notably, even applications that do not explicitly define Server Functions may still be vulnerable if they support React Server Components. This vulnerability enables attackers to: Disrupt service availability Degrade server performance Potentially cause cascading infrastructure impact The React team has confirmed that earlier fixes were incomplete, leaving several patched versions still vulnerable until this latest release. Medium Severity: Source Code Exposure CVE-2025-55183 CVSS Score: 5.3 (Medium) Researchers discovered that certain malformed requests could cause Server Functions to return their own source code when arguments are explicitly or implicitly stringified. This may expose: Hardcoded secrets inside Server Functions Internal logic and implementation details Inlined helper functions, depending on bundler behavior Important clarification: Only source-level secrets may be exposed. Runtime secrets such as process.env.SECRET are not affected. What Is Affected and Who Needs to Take Action The newly disclosed vulnerabilities impact the same React Server Components packages as the previously reported issue, and affect a range of commonly used frameworks and bundlers. Teams should review their dependency tree carefully to determine whether an upgrade is required. Affected Packages and Versions These vulnerabilities affect the same packages and version ranges as the previously disclosed React Server Components issue. Affected packages react-server-dom-webpack react-server-dom-parcel react-server-dom-turbopack Vulnerable versions 19.0.0 → 19.0.2 19.1.0 → 19.1.3 19.2.0 → 19.2.2 Fixed Versions (Required Upgrade) The React team has backported fixes to the following versions: 19.0.3 19.1.4 19.2.3 If your project uses any of the affected packages, upgrade immediately to one of the versions above. ⚠️ If you already updated last week, you still need to update again. Versions 19.0.2, 19.1.3, and 19.2.2 are not fully secure. Impacted Frameworks and Bundlers Several popular frameworks and tools depend on or bundle the vulnerable packages, including: Next.js React Router Waku @parcel/rsc @vite/rsc-plugin rwsdk Refer to your framework’s upgrade instructions to ensure the correct patched versions are installed. Who Is Not Affected Apps that do not use a server Apps not using React Server Components Apps not relying on frameworks or bundlers that support RSC React Native Considerations React Native applications that do not use monorepos or react-dom are generally not affected by these vulnerabilities. For React Native projects using a monorepo, only the following packages need to be updated if they are installed: react-server-dom-webpack react-server-dom-parcel react-server-dom-turbopack Upgrading these packages does not require updating react or react-dom and will not cause version mismatch issues in React Native. Recommended Solutions and Mitigation Strategy While upgrading to the fixed versions is mandatory, these vulnerabilities also expose broader weaknesses in dependency management and secret handling that teams should address to reduce future risk. Immediate Fix All affected applications should upgrade immediately to one of the patched versions: 19.0.3 19.1.4 19.2.3 Previously released patches were incomplete, and hosting provider mitigations should be considered temporary safeguards only, not a long-term solution. Updating to the fixed versions remains the only reliable mitigation. Automate Dependency Updates to Reduce Exposure Time Modern JavaScript ecosystems make it difficult to manually track security advisories across all dependencies. Using tools such as Renovate or Dependabot helps automatically detect vulnerable versions and create upgrade pull requests as soon as fixes are released. This reduces response time and lowers the risk of running partially patched or outdated packages in production. Ensure CI/CD Pipelines Can Absorb Security Upgrades Safely Frequent dependency upgrades are only safe when supported by reliable automated testing. Maintaining comprehensive CI/CD pipelines with sufficient test coverage allows teams to apply security updates quickly while minimizing the risk of breaking changes. This enables faster remediation when new vulnerabilities are disclosed. Remove Secrets from Source Code to Limit Blast Radius Secrets embedded directly in source code may be exposed if similar vulnerabilities arise again. Store secrets using managed services such as AWS SSM Parameter Store or AWS Secrets Manager Implement key rotation mechanisms without downtime Even if source code is exposed, properly managed runtime secrets significantly limit real-world impact. Why Follow-Up CVEs Are Common After Critical Disclosures It is common for critical vulnerabilities to uncover additional issues once researchers begin probing adjacent code paths. When an initial fix is released, security researchers often attempt to bypass it using variant exploit techniques. This pattern has appeared repeatedly across the industry. A well-known example is Log4Shell, where multiple follow-up CVEs were reported after the first disclosure. While additional disclosures can be frustrating, they usually indicate: Active security review Responsible disclosure A healthy patch and verification cycle Final Notes Some hosting companies set up quick fixes, yet those aren't enough on their own. Keeping dependencies updated is still a top way to stay safe from new supply-chain risks. If your application uses React Server Components, reach out to Haposoft now! We'll figure out what’s impacted while taking care of the update without mess. It means going through your dependencies one by one, making sure everything builds right in the end.
serverless-architecture-aws-lambda
Nov 27, 2025
15 min read
Designing A Serverless Architecture With AWS Lambda
Workloads spike, drop, and shift without warning, and fixed servers rarely keep up. AWS Lambda serverless architecture approaches this with a simple idea: run code only on events, scale instantly, and remove the burden of always-on infrastructure. It’s a model that reshapes how event-driven systems are designed and operated. Architecture of a Serverless System with AWS Lambda Event-driven systems depend on a few core pieces, and aws lambda serverless architecture keeps them tight and minimal. Everything starts with an event source, flows through a small, focused function, and ends in a downstream service that stores or distributes the result. Event Sources AWS Lambda is activated strictly by events. Typical sources include: S3 when an object is created or updated API Gateway for synchronous HTTP calls DynamoDB Streams for row-level changes SNS / SQS for asynchronous message handling Kinesis / EventBridge for high-volume or scheduled events CloudWatch Events for cron-based triggers Each trigger delivers structured context (request parameters, object keys, stream records, message payloads), allowing the function to determine the required operation without maintaining state between invocations. Lambda Function Layer Lambda functions are designed to remain small and focused. A function typically performs a single operation such as transformation, validation, computation, or routing. The architecture assumes: Stateless execution: no in-memory persistence between invocations. Externalized state: stored in services like S3, DynamoDB, Secrets Manager, or Parameter Store. Short execution cycles: predictable runtime and reduced cold-start sensitivity. Isolated environments: each invocation receives a dedicated runtime sandbox. This separation simplifies horizontal scaling and keeps failure domains small. Versioning and Aliases Lambda versioning provides immutable snapshots of function code and configuration. Once published, a version cannot be modified. Aliases act as pointers to specific versions (e.g., prod, staging, canary), enabling controlled traffic shifting. Typical scenarios include: Blue/Green Deployment: switch alias from version N → N+1 in one step. Canary Deployment: shift partial traffic to a new version. Rollback: repoint alias back to the previous version without redeploying code. This mechanism isolates code promotion from code packaging, making rollouts deterministic and reversible. Concurrency and Scaling Lambda scales by launching separate execution environments as event volume increases. AWS handles provisioning, lifecycle, and teardown automatically. Invocation-level guarantees ensure that scaling behavior aligns with event volume without manual intervention. Key controls include: Reserved Concurrency — caps the maximum number of parallel executions for a function to protect downstream systems (e.g., DynamoDB, RDS, third-party APIs). Provisioned Concurrency — keeps execution environments warm to minimize cold-start latency for latency-sensitive or high-traffic endpoints. Burst limits — define initial scaling throughput across regions. Reference Pipeline (S3 → Lambda → DynamoDB/SNS → Glacier) A common pattern in aws lambda serverless architecture is event-based data processing. This pipeline supports workloads such as media ingestion (VOD), IoT telemetry, log aggregation, ETL preprocessing, and other burst-driven data flows. Example flow: Integration Patterns in AWS Lambda Serverless Architecture Lambda typically works alongside other AWS services to support event-driven workloads. Most integrations fall into a few recurring patterns below. Lambda + S3 When new data lands in S3, Lambda doesn’t receive the file — it receives a compact event record that identifies what changed. Most of the logic starts by pulling the object or reading its metadata directly from the bucket. This integration is built around the idea that the arrival of data defines the start of the workflow. Typical operations Read the uploaded object Run validation or content checks Produce transformed or derivative outputs Store metadata or results in DynamoDB or another S3 prefix Lambda + DynamoDB Streams This integration behaves closer to a commit log than a file trigger. DynamoDB Streams guarantee ordered delivery per partition, and Lambda processes batches rather than single items. Failures reprocess the entire batch, so the function must be idempotent. Use cases tend to fall into a few categories: updating read models, syncing data to external services, publishing domain events, or capturing audit trails. The “before” and “after” images included in each record make it possible to detect exactly what changed without additional queries. Lambda + API Gateway Unlike S3 or Streams, the API Gateway path is synchronous. Lambda must complete within HTTP latency budgets and return a well-formed response. The function receives a full request context—headers, method, path parameters, JWT claims—and acts as the application logic behind the endpoint. A minimal handler usually: Validates the inbound request Executes domain logic Writes or reads from storage Returns JSON with proper status codes No queues, no retries, no batching—just request/response. This removes the need for EC2, load balancers, or container orchestration for API-level traffic. Lambda + Step Functions Here Lambda isn’t reacting to an event, it’s being invoked as part of a workflow. Step Functions control timing, retries, branching, and long-running coordination. Lambda performs whatever unit of work is assigned to that state, then hands the result back to the state machine. Workloads that fit this pattern: multi-stage data pipelines approval or review flows tasks that need controlled retries processes where orchestration is more important than compute Lambda + Messaging (SNS, SQS, EventBridge, Kinesis) Each messaging service integrates with Lambda differently: SNS delivers discrete messages for fan-out scenarios. One message → one invocation. SQS provides queue semantics; Lambda polls, receives batches, and must delete messages explicitly on success. EventBridge routes structured events based on rules and supports cross-account buses. Kinesis enforces shard-level ordering, and Lambda processes batches sequentially per shard. Depending on the source, the function may need to handle batching, ordering guarantees, partial retries, or DLQ routing. This category is the most varied because the semantics are completely different from one messaging service to another. Recommended Setup for AWS Lambda Serverless Architecture A practical baseline configuration that reflects typical usage patterns and cost behavior for a Lambda-based event-driven system. Technical Recommendations A stable Lambda-based architecture usually follows a small set of practical rules that keep execution predictable and operations lightweight: Function Structure Keep each Lambda focused on one task (SRP). Store configuration in environment variables for each environment (dev/staging/prod). Execution Controls Apply strict timeouts to prevent runaway compute and unnecessary billing. Enable retries for async triggers and route failed events to a DLQ (SQS or SNS). Security Assign least-privilege IAM roles so each function can access only what it actually needs. Observability Send logs to CloudWatch Logs. Use CloudWatch Metrics and X-Ray for tracing, latency analysis, and dependency visibility. Cost Profile and Expected Savings Below is a reference cost breakdown for a typical Lambda workload using the configuration above: Component Unit Price Usage Monthly Cost Lambda Invocations $0.20 / 1M 3M ~$0.60 Lambda Compute (512 MB, 200 ms) ~$0.0000008333 / ms ~600M ms ~$500 S3 Storage (with lifecycle) ~$0.023 / GB ~5 TB ~$115 Total – – ≈ $615/month With this model, teams typically see 40–60% lower cost compared to fixed server-based infrastructures, along with near-zero operational overhead because no servers need to be maintained or scaled manually. Cost Optimization Tips Lambda charges based on invocations + compute time, so smaller and shorter functions are naturally cheaper. Event-driven triggers ensure you pay only when real work happens. Apply multi-tier S3 storage: Standard → Standard-IA → Glacier depending on access frequency. Conclusion A serverless architecture aws lambda works best when the system is designed around clear execution paths and predictable event handling. With the right structure in place, the platform stays stable and cost-efficient even when workloads spike unexpectedly. Haposoft is an AWS consulting partner with hands-on experience delivering serverless systems using Lambda, API Gateway, S3, DynamoDB and Step Functions. We help teams review existing architectures, design new AWS workloads and optimize cloud cost without disrupting operations. If you need a practical, production-ready serverless architecture, Haposoft can support you from design to implementation.
cta-background

Subscribe to Haposoft's Monthly Newsletter

Get expert insights on digital transformation and event update straight to your inbox

Let’s Talk about Your Next Project. How Can We Help?

+1 
©Haposoft 2025. All rights reserved