Thank You For Reaching Out To Us
We have received your message and will get back to you within 24-48 hours. Have a great day!

Welcome to Haposoft Blog

Explore our blog for fresh insights, expert commentary, and real-world examples of project development that we're eager to share with you.
10-technology-trends-2026
latest post
Jan 09, 2026
15 min read
10 Technology Trends Defining How Systems Will Be Built in 2026
Gartner has released its list of 10 strategic technology trends for 2026, highlighting how AI, platforms, and security are becoming core to modern systems. Rather than future concepts, the trends reflect changes already affecting how teams build, scale, and govern technology today. Why These Trends Matter in 2026 The short answer is that experimentation is no longer enough. Many organizations have already tried AI, automation, or advanced analytics in isolated projects. What’s happening now is a shift from trial to commitment. Once these technologies move into core systems, the cost of poor architectural and governance decisions becomes very hard to undo. The 2026 trends highlight where that pressure is coming from. Platforms are expected to support increasingly complex AI workloads without exploding costs. Security teams are dealing with threats that move too quickly for purely reactive defenses. At the same time, regulations and geopolitical realities are starting to influence where data lives and how infrastructure is designed. What makes the 2026 trends stand out is how closely they connect. Advances in generative AI lead naturally to agent-based systems, which in turn increase the need for more context-aware and domain-specific models. As AI moves deeper into core systems, governance, security, and data protection stop being secondary concerns. To make this complexity easier to navigate, Gartner groups the trends into three themes: The Architect, The Synthesist, and The Vanguard. This framing helps teams look at the stack as a sequence of concerns, not ten separate problems. Top 10 Strategic Technology Trends for 2026 Gartner’s 2026 list includes the following ten trends: AI-Native Development Platforms AI Supercomputing Platforms Confidential Computing Multiagent Systems Domain-Specific Language Models Physical AI Preemptive Cybersecurity Digital Provenance AI Security Platforms Geopatriation 1. AI-Native Development Platforms AI-native development platforms reflect how generative AI is becoming part of everyday software development, not a separate tool. Developers are already using AI to write code, generate tests, review changes, and produce documentation. The shift in 2026 is that this usage is moving from informal experimentation to more structured, platform-level adoption. As AI becomes embedded in development workflows, questions around code quality, security boundaries, and team practices start to matter just as much as speed. 2. AI Supercomputing Platforms AI supercomputing platforms address the growing demands of modern AI workloads. Training, fine-tuning, and running large models require far more compute than traditional enterprise systems were designed to support. This puts pressure on infrastructure choices, from hardware and architecture to how shared compute resources are managed. In practice, teams are being forced to think more carefully about cost, capacity, and control as AI workloads scale. 3. Confidential Computing Confidential computing focuses on protecting data while it is being processed, not just when it is stored or transmitted. As AI systems handle more sensitive data, traditional security boundaries are no longer enough. This trend reflects a growing need to run analytics and AI workloads in environments where data remains protected even from the underlying infrastructure. For many teams, it shifts security discussions closer to architecture and runtime design. 4. Multiagent Systems Multiagent systems describe a move away from single, monolithic AI models toward collections of smaller, specialized agents working together. Each agent handles a specific task, while coordination logic manages how they interact. This approach makes automation more flexible and scalable, but it also introduces new operational concerns. Visibility, control, and failure handling become critical as agents are given more autonomy across workflows. 5. Domain-Specific Language Models Domain-specific language models are built to operate within a particular industry or functional context. Instead of general-purpose responses, these models are trained or adapted to understand domain terminology, rules, and constraints. The trend reflects growing demand for higher accuracy and reliability in production use cases, especially in regulated or complex environments. As a result, data quality and domain knowledge become just as important as model size. 6. Physical AI Physical AI brings intelligence out of purely digital systems and into the physical world. This includes robots, drones, smart machines, and connected equipment that can sense, decide, and act in real environments. The trend reflects growing interest in using AI to improve operational efficiency, safety, and automation beyond screens and dashboards. For most teams, the challenge is less about experimentation and more about integrating AI reliably with hardware, sensors, and real-world constraints. 7. Preemptive Cybersecurity Preemptive cybersecurity shifts the focus from reacting to incidents toward preventing them before damage occurs. As attack surfaces expand and threats move faster, traditional detection-and-response models struggle to keep up. This trend reflects growing use of AI and automation to anticipate risks, identify weak signals, and block threats earlier in the attack lifecycle. Security becomes more about continuous risk reduction than isolated incident handling. 8. Digital Provenance Digital provenance is about verifying where data, software, and AI-generated content come from and whether they can be trusted. As AI systems produce more outputs and rely on more external inputs, knowing the origin and integrity of digital assets becomes critical. This trend reflects rising concern around tampered data, unverified models, and synthetic content. Provenance adds traceability to systems that would otherwise be opaque. 9. AI Security Platforms AI security platforms focus on securing AI systems as a distinct layer, rather than treating them as just another application. As organizations use a mix of third-party models, internal tools, and custom agents, visibility and control become harder to maintain. This trend reflects the need for centralized oversight of how AI is accessed, how data flows through models, and how risks such as data leakage or misuse are managed. For many teams, AI security is becoming a dedicated discipline rather than an extension of traditional security tools. 10. Geopatriation Geopatriation addresses the growing impact of geopolitics and regulation on technology architecture. Data residency rules, supply chain risks, and regional regulations are increasingly influencing where workloads can run and how systems are designed. This trend reflects a shift away from fully globalized cloud strategies toward more regional or sovereign approaches. In practice, it forces teams to consider flexibility, portability, and compliance as core architectural concerns. Conclusion The 2026 technology trends above reflect a clear shift in how technology is being used and governed. AI is moving deeper into core systems, automation is expanding across workflows, and trust is becoming a technical requirement rather than an assumption. These trends are less about predicting the future and more about describing the conditions teams are already working under. For organizations across the tech industry, the value of this list is not in adopting every trend at once, but in understanding how they connect. Decisions around platforms, orchestration, and governance are increasingly linked. The sooner teams recognize those links, the easier it becomes to make technology choices that hold up over time.
android-16kb-memory-page-size
Jan 08, 2026
15 min read
Android 16KB Memory Page Size: What App Owners Need to Prepare
Google Play is enforcing support for 16KB memory page size on newer Android versions. While most apps are unaffected, Android apps that use native code may fail builds or have updates rejected if they are not updated in time. From November 1st, 2025, all new Android apps and all updates to existing apps submitted to Google Play must support 16KB memory page size. Apps that do not meet this requirement may be rejected during submission, even if they previously worked. This mainly affects apps that include native code. What Is Memory Page Size and Why Android Is Changing It Memory page size is the basic unit Android uses to work with memory. For a long time, this size has effectively been 4KB, and most Android apps, especially those with native code — were built around that assumption. Developers rarely think about it because, until now, it mostly “just worked.” That’s changing as Android starts supporting 16KB memory pages on newer devices. This shift isn’t cosmetic, it’s driven by newer hardware, larger RAM sizes, and the need for more efficient memory handling at the system level. The important part for app owners is that native binaries built with old assumptions may no longer behave the same way unless they’re updated. Which Apps Are Affected by the 16KB Page Size Change This 16KB page size change does not affect every Android app. The risk is mainly tied to native code, because many native libraries were originally built with a 4KB page size assumption that may not hold on newer devices. Usually not affected Apps built purely with Java or Kotlin Apps that do not use the NDK Apps that do not bundle any native SDKs Needs to be checked Apps using the NDK or C and C++ code Apps that include .so libraries Apps using third party SDKs with native code Frameworks with native layers such as React Native, Flutter, or game engines This structure allows teams to quickly identify whether their app is likely affected without digging into low level system details. Being in the “needs to be checked” group does not mean the app is broken, but it does mean native dependencies should be reviewed before the next update. What App Owners Should Do Next For most teams, this is not a large migration project. It is a short verification and cleanup process that helps ensure future Android updates are not blocked by native compatibility issues. Check whether your app includes native code Start by confirming whether the app contains any native components. This includes NDK code written by your team, bundled .so libraries, and native binaries that come from third-party SDKs or frameworks. Even apps written mostly in Java or Kotlin can still include native code indirectly. Review native dependencies and ownership Once native code is identified, list all native artifacts used by the app, including shared libraries and SDKs. At this stage, dependencies are classified into two groups: components the team controls and components provided by third parties. This distinction determines whether an issue can be fixed by rebuilding or requires a vendor update or replacement. Update or rebuild where needed Each native dependency is checked against Android’s 16KB compatibility requirements. SDKs and frameworks are updated to versions that support the new page size where available. For self-built native code, C or C++ libraries are rebuilt using appropriate NDK configurations. If a third-party dependency does not yet support 16KB, it is flagged early so alternatives or mitigation options can be considered. Test and prepare for release After changes are applied, the app is tested in an environment that reflects 16KB page size behavior. Key user flows are verified to ensure no regressions appear at runtime. Once testing is complete, the app is ready for future updates that comply with Google Play requirements. Final Notes The 16KB page size requirement is a platform-level change that mainly impacts apps with native dependencies. The challenge is often not the fix itself, but identifying hidden native risks early enough to avoid blocked updates. To support teams at different stages, we typically help in three focused ways: Impact check to confirm whether an app is affected Native dependency review to identify upgrade or rebuild risks Targeted fixes and validation to ensure future updates can be published smoothly If you’re unsure whether your app needs changes, feel free to get in touch for an initial check.
cta-background

Subscribe to Haposoft's Monthly Newsletter

Get expert insights on digital transformation and event update straight to your inbox

Let’s Talk about Your Next Project. How Can We Help?

+1 
©Haposoft 2025. All rights reserved